The Real Price of Marking and How Automation and AI are Reshaping ELICOS Efficiency

Testing is essential in every ELICOS program. It ensures students are placed correctly, track progress, and meet learning outcomes. But behind every test lies a hidden expense — manual marking.
For most colleges, manual marking quietly consumes tens of thousands of dollars and hundreds of trainer hours each year. Here’s what it really costs — and how automation can change everything.
Pre-Entry Placement Testing
Before students even start class, colleges conduct placement tests to determine entry level.If a school tests around 20 students per month, and each test takes 22 minutes to mark manually (2 minutes for reading and 5 minutes each for writing, speaking, grammar, and vocabulary), the workload quickly adds up.
That’s 7.3 hours per month, or $454 in trainer time at $62/hour. Across a full year, that’s $5,450 in marking labour. Add standard 12% superannuation and on-costs, and the real cost becomes about $6,100 per year — before any moderation or admin time is included.
Ongoing Classroom Testing
Once students begin their studies, the testing continues. A typical ELICOS class has 15 students who complete tests every four weeks — usually in weeks 4, 8, and 12 of a 12-week term. Each test covers Reading, Writing, Speaking, Grammar, and Vocabulary.
Manual Marking Time
For each student: Reading – 2 min | Writing – 5 min | Speaking – 5 min | Grammar – 5 min | Vocabulary – 5 min Total: 22 minutes per student per test.
That equals 5.5 hours of marking per class per round, or 16.5 hours per term. At $62/hour, that’s $1,023 per class, or $1,145 once superannuation is included. For a college with 10 classes, the annual cost reaches about $45,800 in real marking expenses.
The Annual Picture
Combine placement and progress testing:
$45,800 + $6,100 = ≈ $51,900 per year
And that excludes moderation, remarking, or administrative data entry.
Laureate Online Testing: From $2.60 per Test — with 2-Minute Trainer Review
This is where automation shifts the equation.Laureate Online Testing automatically scores Reading, Grammar, Vocabulary, Writing, and Speaking using AI aligned to CEFR and IELTS-style rubrics.
Teachers still review Writing and Speaking for quality assurance, averaging two minutes per task — around four minutes per test.That’s 0.0667 hours, costing $4.13 in trainer time, or $4.63 including super.Add the Laureate platform fee — as low as $2.60 per test — and the total cost is roughly $7.20 per student instead of more than $20.
Cost Comparison
Pre-Testing
Tests per year: 20 × 12 months = 240 tests
Manual (incl. super): $6,100
Laureate: 240 × $7.20 = $1,730
Ongoing Classroom Testing
Tests per year: 15 students × 3 rounds × 10 classes = 450 tests
Manual (incl. super): $45,800
Laureate: 450 × $7.20 = $3,240
Category | Manual Marking (incl. super) | Laureate (AI + 2-min review) |
Pre-Testing | $6,100 | $1,730 |
Ongoing Testing | $45,800 | $3,240 |
Total Annual | $51,900 | $4,970 |
Annual savings: ≈ $46,900 (90% reduction) and over 550 trainer hours returned to teaching and mentoring.
Time and Quality Gains
Aspect | Manual | Laureate |
Trainer marking time | ~660 hrs / yr | ~95 hrs / yr |
Feedback delivery | 1–3 days | Instant |
Marking consistency | Human variation | Standardised AI rubric |
Audit evidence | Manual records | Full digital trail |

Reinvest the Savings
Saving nearly $47 000 per year frees real resources.Funds could support:
Teacher professional development
Student engagement initiatives
Scholarships or marketing programs
LMS and technology upgrades
Extra staff during peak intakes
Automation doesn’t replace teachers — it empowers them by removing repetitive admin and enabling faster, richer feedback.
Final Thought
Manual marking once felt inevitable, but it’s now an avoidable expense. With AI-assisted testing from $2.60 per test and a quick 2-minute review, ELICOS colleges can cut marking costs by over 90%, deliver instant feedback, and give teachers their time back.
Laureate Online Testing — smarter testing, happier teachers, faster feedback.
Because great teaching starts when the marking ends!





Comments